Post by amirmukaddas on Mar 11, 2024 22:41:31 GMT -8
You can consider the third part of the guidelines as a sort of "verification" of the previous two . This does not mean that it is less important, on the contrary, very often it is precisely on this point that an inexperienced quality rater worries for hours and hours, risking making quite a few evaluation errors. I'm just saying that when a site is well done from a qualitative point of view and responds perfectly to queries, be they desktop or mobile, it shouldn't fear receiving a low rating on the scale we're going to see now. Quality rating scale As you can see, the rating scale offers five main possibilities: Fails to Meet (FailsM) Slightly Meets (SM) Moderately Meets (MM) Highly Meets (HM) Fully Meets (FullyM) Fails to Meet indicates that the needs are not satisfied at all, that NO USER can find answers on that page/site to the needs expressed through queries.
Highly Meets serves to report a page that responds pertinently to the query but is helpful to VERY FEW USERS, while the majority will be forced to look elsewhere. Moderately Meets : content USEFUL FOR MANY users or VERY USEFUL FOR A FEW. So a fair amount of people will want other results. Highly Meets : VERY USEFUL FOR MANY or ALMOST ALL users. Fully Meets - Answers your query perfectly and NO ONE will need to search for other Denmark Telegram Number Data results in response to their search. You will certainly have noticed two things. First of all, it is very rare for the quality rater to be able to give a clear answer , even more so when it comes to the two extremes of the scale . For this reason there are a series of intermediate cleats that allow you to make a more relevant and considered judgement. Relevance wins Secondly, I invite you to reflect on the words that I deliberately wrote in capital letters, because it is precisely on those terms that much of the game is played.
The number of people who find your content useful, because it is complete and perfectly responds to the query, is the real key. In short, when you create an article or a page, try to do it with only one goal in mind: it must answer the questions of as many people as possible in an absolutely relevant way, with quality content . Do it and Google will reward you, you can be sure of it! Conclusions I will not go into further explanations on the guidelines because, as I told you at the beginning, I intend to create a series of targeted insights that I will publish on my blog from time to time. After all, a simple article, even if substantial and structured, would not be enough to analyze in detail all the suggestions that Google allows us to grasp through the Quality Raters guidelines . What interested me was leaving you a trace, a message. As well as the knowledge of an additional tool at our disposal to understand what Google really wants from our sites . Many information may have seemed obvious and banal to you.
Highly Meets serves to report a page that responds pertinently to the query but is helpful to VERY FEW USERS, while the majority will be forced to look elsewhere. Moderately Meets : content USEFUL FOR MANY users or VERY USEFUL FOR A FEW. So a fair amount of people will want other results. Highly Meets : VERY USEFUL FOR MANY or ALMOST ALL users. Fully Meets - Answers your query perfectly and NO ONE will need to search for other Denmark Telegram Number Data results in response to their search. You will certainly have noticed two things. First of all, it is very rare for the quality rater to be able to give a clear answer , even more so when it comes to the two extremes of the scale . For this reason there are a series of intermediate cleats that allow you to make a more relevant and considered judgement. Relevance wins Secondly, I invite you to reflect on the words that I deliberately wrote in capital letters, because it is precisely on those terms that much of the game is played.
The number of people who find your content useful, because it is complete and perfectly responds to the query, is the real key. In short, when you create an article or a page, try to do it with only one goal in mind: it must answer the questions of as many people as possible in an absolutely relevant way, with quality content . Do it and Google will reward you, you can be sure of it! Conclusions I will not go into further explanations on the guidelines because, as I told you at the beginning, I intend to create a series of targeted insights that I will publish on my blog from time to time. After all, a simple article, even if substantial and structured, would not be enough to analyze in detail all the suggestions that Google allows us to grasp through the Quality Raters guidelines . What interested me was leaving you a trace, a message. As well as the knowledge of an additional tool at our disposal to understand what Google really wants from our sites . Many information may have seemed obvious and banal to you.